‘I don’t need to own’: This California couple surrendered their low mortgage rate to rent and build their savings instead — why homeownership is no longer part of the American dream
For Chelsey and Spencer Marks, the American dream just wasn’t worth the hassle — leading the couple to sell their three-bedroom home in Cathedral City, California for a rental in La Quinta instead.
The Marks were tired of dealing with the costs of home maintenance and even after three years, hadn’t grown accustomed to the desert winds howling outside their doors.
Don't miss
Commercial real estate has beaten the stock market for 25 years — but only the super rich could buy in. Here's how even ordinary investors can become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger
Cost-of-living in America is still out of control — use these 3 'real assets' to protect your wealth today, no matter what the US Fed does or says
These 5 magic money moves will boost you up America's net worth ladder in 2024 — and you can complete each step within minutes. Here's how
“I was like, I can’t do this anymore,” Chelsey, 41, told the Los Angeles Times. “One day I came home and I was like, ‘We’re selling the house.’”
But despite surrendering their low mortgage rate and home equity, the couple has now managed to pay off their credit card debt, build their savings — and are even planning a trip to Italy in the fall.
Plus, when something in their rental breaks, there’s a maintenance person to fix it.
“I don’t need to own [a home] to be living that life that I want to live,” Chelsea said.
Why renting is becoming part of the new American Dream
Built-for-rent homes can offer private backyards and garages, just like your typical single-family start — but they come at cheaper price points for many Americans who can no longer afford to buy in the current market.
“There’s still an inadequate supply of housing, the cost of housing has continued to rise, renters are renting longer,” Doug Ressler, manager of business intelligence at commercial real estate firm Yardi Matrix, told the Los Angeles Times.
“The large providers are looking at build for rent as a legitimate strategy to be able to fulfill demand for those people that are on a budget and looking to have a larger square footage than an apartment.”
Construction commenced on about 18,000 single-family, built-for-rent homes in the first quarter of 2024 — surging 20% compared to the first quarter of 2023, according to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), which analyzed data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Quarterly Starts and Completions by Purpose and Design.
And around 90,000 single-family homes that started construction last year (10% of the total) are rentals — almost doubling in two years — according to research from the National Association of Realtors.
Ressler notes that demand for more spacious housing strengthened as millennials began having children and growing families, and firms began buying up subdivisions and converting them into rental properties or building homes for the purposes of renting them out.
Recent data from Entrata, a property management software company, reveals 41% of renters say their “American Dream” has nothing to do with homeownership — and 1-in-5 expect to be lifelong renters by choice.
About two-thirds of these respondents report renting fits their current lifestyle better than owning a home and nearly a quarter say they appreciate the location and flexibility that renting affords them.
Read more: Car insurance rates have spiked in the US to a stunning $2,150/year — but you can be smarter than that. Here's how you can save yourself as much as $820 annually in minutes (it's 100% free)
Some lawmakers have concerns this could drive homeownership further out of reach
Federal and state lawmakers fear that investment firms buying up the supply of single-family homes could push rental and homeownership prices up even further.
Real estate investors purchased about 44,000 U.S. homes in the first quarter of 2024 — representing 19% of total home purchases — according to Redfin.
Many wealthy investors have the ability to purchase properties in cash, forgoing expensive mortgage rates, and often snag discounts for buying in bulk.
Corporate investors “have a significant advantage over a typical California family,” said Assemblymember Christopher M. Ward (D-San Diego), according to the Los Angeles Times. Ward has proposed legislation to prohibit institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes in bulk.
“You are allowing a new phenomenon in transactions that is inherently uncompetitive.”
What to read next
Car insurance premiums in America are through the roof — and only getting worse. But 5 minutes could have you paying as little as $29/month
Jeff Bezos and Oprah Winfrey invest in this asset to keep their wealth safe — you may want to do the same in 2024
Stop crushing your retirement dreams with wealth-killing costs and headaches — here are 10 'must-haves' when choosing a trading platform (and 1 option that has them all)
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.